Still they have absolutely no problems with skyping (i.e. Not too bad but the speed in our dorm is better. #Skype video call low quality download#The thing I don't understand is the following: When I go over to my friends house who have their own internet connection they have a download speed of maybe 10 - 12 Mbit/s and an upload speed of mabye 2 - 3Mbit/s. We tried to eliminate p2p sessions but I'm not sure if it really helped. #Skype video call low quality tv#Many students dont't have their own TV and want to watch movies online. I can't and won't start eliminating unnecessary video streaming. I checked air quality but the WLc doesn't give my any Bevilacqua I hope (and think) that they did things like this think some questions of you are already answered above. We have an external contractor who was in charge of installing our infrastructure. Well and I guess that the antennas are installed correctly. The university provides the actual access to the Internet. Uplink to the rest of my network: We have a 100Mbit fiberglass cable going to the university network. The WLC controls all the APs and tries to distribute the channels to the APs in the best way possible. I don't think that there's any channel interferrance. The APs are deployed in the ceiling of the hallway. I'm pretty sure that it's not fibre so I'd guess it's 100Mbit/s or 1Gbit/s. Actually I don't know what kind of uplinks our APs have. We checked it again when people complained about bad video/audio quality with skype. We checked the signal in every single room after installing the APs and alle rooms are fine. So I'd guess that in the average 4 - 6 people connect to one WAP.Ģ. We have 41 Access Points and 213 inhabitants. Thanks to all of you for your Highest amount of people using wireless at any given time: Probably 160 tops. If you do have wired connections, better to use them (properly configured) then wireless. I realize you're hoping for some simple solution, but very doubtful you'll fine one. To insure real-time service quality across both wireless and/or Internet is very, let's say, "chalenging". #Skype video call low quality how to#You've mentioned the "silver" QoS class on the WLC, but for this class to be effective, you need to have different classes for different traffic, but even when you do, many wireless clients don't know how to do wireless QoS when they transmit.įor most purposes, wireless is like old shared Ethernet, so it's not really a good medium for real-time VoIP or video. You don't mention available wireless bandwidth, number of LWAPs, type of bandwidth, wireless clients, RF "air quality". For instance, you describe (low) usage of you 100 Mbps Interlink, but when dealing with real-time traffic, congestion issues happen at the millisecond level, and problems can occur as surprisingly low usage levels. What you've described can be very difficult to diagnose indirectly many possible issues. In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk. #Skype video call low quality professional#Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Now THAT is going to cause issue and bandwidth speed. You have three usable channels, namely: 1, 6 and 11. The most common scenario I've seen is this: In the space of, say, an auditorium or lecture theatre there's about 20+ WAPs and it's operating on 802.11b/g radio. There's a question of the amount of WAP, how you deploy your WAP? How many radios do you have per WAP? Are there any channel interferrance? What is your uplink to the rest of your network? Heck, I might even ask you the most stupid question of: If your WAP have external antennas, are these antennas installed correctly (meaning 2.4Ghz antenna installed to the 2.4Ghz radio and vice versa). This number goes down to around 6 to 8 when you say that clients are streaming video. For instance, if you are saying that the clients are just browsing the net, downloading internet radio traffic or sending/receiving emails then we are talking about a ration of 30 clients to a WAP. However, this number can be "bent" depending on the type of traffic the clients are pushing. One of the Cisco wireless rule-of-thumb, the ideal amount of wireless clients associated/authenticated to a wireless access point (WAP) is 25. Wireless, as a whole, is like a hub: One talks, eveybody else listens and waits for their turn to "talk".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |